Legal Opinion

Childs v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma State University

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 9, 1993No. 77583, 77584PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Justice.

The dispositive issue for review is whether the amended provisions of 51 O.S.Supp. 1988 § 155(14) of the Governmental Tort Claims Act [Tort Claims Act] 1 extended the State’s immunity to include its liability to persons, not then in the employ of the State of Oklahoma, who were covered for the injurious event in suit by the workers’ compensation regime of any state. We answer in the affirmative.

I

THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION

In 1989 John Childs and Randy Hood [Childs and Hood], both Texas residents, were in Oklahoma while in the course of their employment with the same private…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Hughes v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Healy v. Beer InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Vanderpool v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Bancoklahoma Mortgage Corp. v. Capital Title Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  2. Gladstone v. Bartlesville Independent School District No. 30Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  3. Barrett v. TallonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  4. Barrios v. Haskell Cnty. Pub. Facilities Auth.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  5. State ex rel. Macy v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API