Legal Opinion
Barrett v. Tallon
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 19, 1994No. Nos. 93-7029, 93-7080PublishedCited by 95 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Robert L. Barrett, Johnny Slo-ver, and their cattle companies appeal from separate orders of the district court (1) dismissing their complaint for failure to state a claim, Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), and (2) imposing against them Rule 11 sanctions of $32,885.15. For convenience we decide both appeals (Nos. 93-7029 and 93-7080) in this opinion. The district court held that the complaint did not state a claim under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968. The plaintiffs do not challenge that holding but…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Frederick Lawrence White, Jr. Benjamin L. Staponski, Jr., and Gwen G. Caranchini v. General Motors Corporation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Braley v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Lawmaster v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Niedermeier v. Office of BaucusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Schwartz v. Celestial Seasonings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Bancoklahoma Mortgage Corp. v. Capital Title Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Hamilton v. Boise Cascade ExpressCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.