McDougall v. McDougall
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNES, C.
Appeal from a judgment of nonsuit. The defendant is the widow of James McDougall, deceased; the plaintiffs, his children by a former marriage. The latter sue to cancel a deed dated June 9, 1899, purporting to convey to the defendant a lot in the city of Los Angeles. Plaintiffs allege, in substance, that the deed was never delivered, and, also, that the signature of the deceased thereto was procured by undue influence. On the trial a nonsuit was granted on the grounds (in effect) that the plaintiffs had failed to show either undue influence or that the deed was not delivered.
1. As to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sheehan v. SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Tillaux v. TillauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Stiles v. CainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Dimond v. SandersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Ward v. DoughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Beals ex rel. Walker v. AresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1919
- Wilcox v. WilcoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Miller v. JansenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Taylor v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Whelan v. University Mound Old Ladies' HomeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.