Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Taylor

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 17, 1944No. Civ. 14498PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

In this action for divorce on the ground of cruelty the court found the cruelties to have been committed but annulled the marriage for the reason that respondent had a living husband at the time of her union with defendant as alleged in the cross-complaint. In his pleading defendant demanded as further affirmative relief the cancel- • lation of a deed whereby he had vested his two properties in respondent and himself as joint tenants. This appeal is from the whole of the judgment. The principal assignment of error is the court’s refusal to set aside the joint tenancy deed. In support thereof…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Allen v. HendrickOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Sanguinetti v. SanguinettiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Steinberger v. SteinbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Pullen v. Placer Country BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Weil v. WeilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Grant v. the Aerodraulics Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Lazzarevich v. LazzarevichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Lawrence v. ShuttCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API