Legal Opinion

Montenegro v. City of Bradbury

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 25, 2013No. B242953PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MANELLA, J.

Appellant Ana Maria Montenegro appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of respondent City of Bradbury. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Montenegro allegedly sustained injuries after falling over a protruding tree trunk while walking along a pathway located beside Royal Oaks Drive North in Bradbury. Montenegro brought suit against Bradbury for negligence, willful failure to warn of a dangerous condition, and dangerous condition of public property, claiming that the exposed tree root and inadequate lighting created a dangerous condition.

According…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Metcalf v. County of San JoaquinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  4. AMBERGER-WARREN v. City of PiedmontCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Armenio v. County of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Burgueno v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Arvizu v. City of Pasadena, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. Arvizu v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
  4. Heskel v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Loeb v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API