Legal Opinion
AMBERGER-WARREN v. City of Piedmont
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 6, 2006No. A112886PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MARCHIANO, P. J.
Plaintiff Anni Amberger-Warren was injured when she slipped and fell in a dog park in Piedmont. She sued the City of Piedmont on the theory that her injuries were caused by a dangerous condition of public property, and defendant obtained summary judgment on the basis of trail immunity (Gov. Code, § 831.4, subd. (b)). Plaintiff contends on appeal that, as a matter of law or as a triable issue of fact, the accident did not occur on a “trail” within the meaning of the immunity statute, and that, even if the accident happened on a trail, defendant is not insulated from…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Davidson v. City of WestminsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Bonanno v. Central Contra Costa Transit AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Stabley v. Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Park AuthorityMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Armenio v. County of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Giannuzzi v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Burgueno v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Leyva v. Crockett & Co.California Court of Appeal · 2017
- Montenegro v. City of BradburyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Prokop v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Arvizu v. City of Pasadena, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.