Metcalf v. County of San Joaquin
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*1126Opinion
CHIN, J.
Government Code section 835, part of California’s Government Claims Act,1 generally provides that “a public entity is liable for injury caused by a dangerous condition of its property if the plaintiff establishes” various circumstances, including “that the property was in a dangerous condition at the time of the injury,” and “either: [][] (a) A negligent or wrongful act or omission of an employee of the public entity within the scope of his employment created the dangerous condition; or [][] (b) The public entity had actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Agarwal v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Cooley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Coalition of Concerned Communities, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- City of Stockton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Cristler v. Express Messenger Systems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Mt. Hawley Insurance v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Quigley v. Garden Valley Fire Protection Dist.California Supreme Court · 2019
- Hasso v. HapkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Transport Insurance v. TIG InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.