Legal Opinion
Armenio v. County of San Mateo
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 19, 1994No. A063222PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HANING, J.
Plaintiff and appellant Ralph Armenio appeals a summary judgment in favor of defendant and respondent County of San Mateo in his action for personal injuries. He contends the trial court erroneously concluded respondent was immune from liability by virtue of Government Code section 831.4, 1 and that triable issues of fact exist concerning the purpose of the trail on which his injuries occurred. We affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
Appellant was injured while riding his bicycle along Sawyer Camp Trail, which is described in the park and recreation resources section of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Delta Farms Reclamation District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Milligan v. City of Laguna BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Giannuzzi v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
3Cited by17 opinions
- AMBERGER-WARREN v. City of PiedmontCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Burgueno v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Carroll v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Treweek v. City of NapaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Leyva v. Crockett & Co.California Court of Appeal · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.