Legal Opinion

Texas Bio- & Agro-Defense Consortium v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 30, 2009No. 09-255CPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE

WILLIAMS, Judge.

In this post-award bid protest, Plaintiff, Texas Bio & Agro-Defense Consortium (“TBAC”) challenges the decision of the United States Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) to select a site in Manhattan, Kansas proposed by Intervenor, Heartland BioAgro Consortium (“HBAC”) for construction and operation of a National Bio & Agro-Defense Facility (“NBAF”) featuring state-of-the-art biocontainment laboratories for research and diagnosis of foreign animal and zoonotic diseases.2 Plaintiff, a non-profit consortium of research…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Hunt Building Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  5. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Square One Armoring Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  2. Eskridge Research Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  3. Harris Patriot Healthcare Solutions, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  4. Pernix Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  5. Draken International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API