Texas Bio- & Agro-Defense Consortium v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE
WILLIAMS, Judge.
In this post-award bid protest, Plaintiff, Texas Bio & Agro-Defense Consortium (“TBAC”) challenges the decision of the United States Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) to select a site in Manhattan, Kansas proposed by Intervenor, Heartland BioAgro Consortium (“HBAC”) for construction and operation of a National Bio & Agro-Defense Facility (“NBAF”) featuring state-of-the-art biocontainment laboratories for research and diagnosis of foreign animal and zoonotic diseases.2 Plaintiff, a non-profit consortium of research…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hunt Building Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Commonwealth Edison Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Square One Armoring Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Eskridge Research Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Harris Patriot Healthcare Solutions, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Pernix Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Draken International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.