Legal Opinion
Eskridge Research Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 26, 2010No. 10-50CPublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNC-TIVE RELIEF
NANCY B. FIRESTONE, Judge.
Pending before the court in this bid protest action filed under 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b) (2006) is the motion for a preliminary injunc*92tion filed by the plaintiff, Eskridge Research Corporation (“plaintiff” or “ERC”) and the motion by the defendant (“government”) to dismiss certain of the plaintiffs claims for lack of jurisdiction. At issue is a contract to provide force protection operational support services (Solicitation No. W912HQ-09-R-0009) awarded by the U.S. Army Corps of…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Contracting, Consulting, Engineering LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Square One Armoring Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Hernandez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Sheridan Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Jacobs Technology Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.