Legal Opinion

State v. Wright

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 18, 2004No. A03-589PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WRIGHT, Judge.

Appellant challenges his convictions of two counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct, arguing that (1) the evidence is insufficient to support the jury’s verdict and (2) he is entitled to a new trial because his attorney agreed to stipulate to an element of the offense without appellant personally waiving the right to have the jury decide that issue. We affirm.

FACTS

In May 2002, appellant Lorenzo Lamont Wright and his girlfriend moved in with Leverder Ford and her family at Ford’s home in Minneapolis. At that time, Ford lived with several children, including her…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. State v. StufflebeanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. State v. AniSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. HagenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  2. State v. KuhlmannCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  3. State v. HintonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  4. State v. CraigCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
  5. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API