State v. Thompson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALBROOKS, Judge.
Appellant pleaded guilty to nine counts of theft by swindle over $35,000 and acknowledged that she was giving up her right to a jury determination of the presence of a factual basis for a sentencing departure. The district court found that such a basis existed and sentenced appellant to the presumptive sentence on counts 1-4 and imposed concurrent sentences of 114 months — a double durational departure from the presumptive 57-month sentences — on counts 5-9. Appellant challenges her sentence, arguing that the upward departure violates her right to a jury trial under…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Roby v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. GivensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. ManningCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- State v. ZuluCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- STATE OF ARIZONA v. JONATHAN McMULLENCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006