Legal Opinion

State v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 5, 2005No. A04-1808PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HALBROOKS, Judge.

Appellant pleaded guilty to nine counts of theft by swindle over $35,000 and acknowledged that she was giving up her right to a jury determination of the presence of a factual basis for a sentencing departure. The district court found that such a basis existed and sentenced appellant to the presumptive sentence on counts 1-4 and imposed concurrent sentences of 114 months — a double durational departure from the presumptive 57-month sentences — on counts 5-9. Appellant challenges her sentence, arguing that the upward departure violates her right to a jury trial under…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Roby v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. State v. GivensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  5. State v. ManningCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  3. State v. ZuluCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  4. STATE OF ARIZONA v. JONATHAN McMULLENCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  5. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API