State v. Craig
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUDSON, Judge.
On appeal from his conviction of possession of a firearm by an ineligible person, appellant Andrew Anthony Craig argues that (1) MinmStat. § 624.713, subd. 1(2), which imposes a lifetime prohibition against the possession of a firearm by a *458person convicted of a crime of violence, violates the Second Amendment as applied to him; (2) the district court committed reversible error by failing to suppress the firearm evidence found during a warrantless search of the car driven by appellant; (3) the district court committed reversible error by accepting appellant’s stipulation…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- McDonald v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. CraigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Dereje v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- State of Minnesota v. Derek Jerome VandykeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Robert Edward Collins, Jr.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Tony XiongCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014