Legal Opinion

State v. Craig

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 5, 2011No. A10-1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUDSON, Judge.

On appeal from his conviction of possession of a firearm by an ineligible person, appellant Andrew Anthony Craig argues that (1) MinmStat. § 624.713, subd. 1(2), which imposes a lifetime prohibition against the possession of a firearm by a *458person convicted of a crime of violence, violates the Second Amendment as applied to him; (2) the district court committed reversible error by failing to suppress the firearm evidence found during a warrantless search of the car driven by appellant; (3) the district court committed reversible error by accepting appellant’s stipulation…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. McDonald v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. CraigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  2. Dereje v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  3. State of Minnesota v. Derek Jerome VandykeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  4. State of Minnesota v. Robert Edward Collins, Jr.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  5. State of Minnesota v. Tony XiongCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API