Legal Opinion

State v. Tomlin

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 27, 2000No. C0-99-920PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HALBROOKS, Judge.

Appellant Kevin Tomlin appeals from his conviction of obstructing legal process pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 609.50, subd. 1(1) (1996). He argues that the misleading statements he made to the police following a hit-and-run accident involving his friends were not sufficient to support his conviction under the statute. He also argues that the trial court’s jury instruction on obstructing legal process materially misstated the law and that the trial court erred in denying his pretrial motion to dismiss for lack of probable cause. Because Tomlin’s lies and misleading…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. KrawskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. State v. CorbinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. State v. CoauetteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  4. State v. OcchinoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  5. State v. PatchCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. TomlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API