Legal Opinion

State v. Corbin

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 8, 1984No. C6-83-1538PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

This is a case of first impression, construing' the 1979 amendment to Minn.Stat. § 100.273, subd. 7 (1982) allowing a hunter to trespass on unposted agricultural land to retrieve a wounded animal without permission of the landowner. The State brought this appeal, pursuant to Rule 28.04, subd. 1, Minn.R.Crim.P., following a pretrial order by the trial court that it would instruct the jury that Minn.Stat. § 100.273, subd. 7, provided a defense in a misdemeanor trespass complaint. We affirm.

The facts, as stipulated, are as follows. On November 6, 1982, Jay Corbin, Ronald…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Wallace v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  3. Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  4. Northland Country Club v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. State v. HaasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. State v. AarsvoldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Renstrom v. Independent School District No. 261Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. State Ex Rel. McMaster v. BensonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  5. State v. HulstCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API