Legal Opinion
State v. Occhino
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 9, 1997No. C5-97-231PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMUNDSON, Judge.
Appellant Richard L. Occhino challenges his misdemeanor convictions for trespassing and obstructing legal process, arguing that the evidence at trial was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict. Occhino also challenges the district court’s refusal to admit an exhibit. We affirm.
FACTS
On October 18,1996, at approximately 1:30 p.m., appellant Richard L. Occhino went to the Duluth police records bureau and spoke with records employee, Diane Parker. Oc-chino requested a copy of his 1991 arrest report. Parker stated that 1991 reports were stored in the basement and she…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States Postal Service v. Council of Greenburgh Civic AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. LoebachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Brian Thomas Hoyland v. Shawn McMenomyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Timothy Galarnyk v. Tom FraserCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Green v. NoccieroCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- King v. AmbsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- State v. PatchCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.