Legal Opinion
State v. Krawsky
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 5, 1988No. CX-87-1793PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
. OPINION
COYNE, Justice.
The issue on this appeal is whether Minn. Stat. § 609.50 (1986), which makes it a misdemeanor to intentionally interfere with a peace officer while the officer is engaged in the performance of his official duties, is unconstitutionally overbroad or vague on its face. The trial court ruled that the statute is facially overbroad and granted defendant Eileen Krawsky’s pre-trial motion to dismiss the prosecution. The court of appeals affirmed. State v. Krawsky, 417 N.W.2d 687 (Minn.App.1988). Holding that the statute is not facially overbroad or vague, we reverse and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- City of Houston v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Charles Wayne Foster and Dana Gay Foster v. Metropolitan Airports Commission, Officers A. Baetz, Bruce Griller, and J. EdblomCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- State v. IhleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Michael J. Gorra v. Floyd Hanson, Patrick Chase, Minnesota State Highway Patrol, an Agency or Division of the State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- State v. VanceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Brian Thomas Hoyland v. Shawn McMenomyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.