Legal Opinion

State v. . Adams

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 23, 1938PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The first question for decision is whether the State has offered evidence sufficient to show the establishment of a cartway over the lands in question. We agree with the trial court that the proof adduced on the hearing supports the present prosecution. S. v. Joyce, 121 N. C., 610, 28 S. E., 366; S. v. Witherspoon, 75 N. C., 222.

In the first place, a prima facie presumption of rightful jurisdiction arises from the fact'that a court of general jurisdiction has acted in the matter. Downing v. White, 211 N. C., 40, 188 S. E., 815; King v. R. R., 184 N. C., 442, 115 S. E., 172; Starnes v.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Philadelphia Co. v. StimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Fort Leavenworth Railroad v. LoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Poindexter v. GreenhowSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. United States v. McBratneySupreme Court of the United States · 1882

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. . DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  2. State v. DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  3. Keen v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Keen v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Austin v. AustinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API