Poindexter v. Greenhow
Supreme Court of the United States
IN' ERROR TO'THE HÜSTINGS COUBT OE THE OITY OE' RICHMOND, STATE OE VIRGINIA.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews
The plaintiff in error, who was: also plaintiff below, brought his action in detinue on the 26th day of'April, 1883, against Samuel C. Greenhow, for the recovery of. specific personal property, to wit, one office desk of the value of thirty dollars, before a police justice in the City of Richmond, who dismissed the same fo,r want of jurisdiction. An appeal was taken by the plaintiff to the Hustings Court for the City of Richmond, where the facts were found by agreement of parties to be as follows: That the plaintiff was a resident of the City of Richmond in the. State of Virginia; that he…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Green v. BiddleSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by347 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Regents of University of California v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
342 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.