Duncan v. Retired Public Employees of Alaska, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Article XII, section 7 of the Alaska Constitution protects retirement benefits of public employees from diminishment or impairment. But benefits may be changed if any detriments are offset by advantages. The main question here is whether as to changes in health insurance plans this balance must be struck taking the perspective of each individual or the group. We conclude that the group perspective must generally be used because individual evaluations are subjective and uncertain.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
In 2000 three retiree organizations and individual…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Allen v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- In Re Unisys Corp. Retiree Medical Benefit "Erisa" Litigation. Gerald E. Pickering, Fred Tonnies, William Leonhardt, Evelyn Schmidt, Dudley Keyes, David Kahl, Paul Wright, Robert Wilt, Clay Bernichon, Edward Valle, Robert B. Welsh, Solveig Tschann, Bernard J. Jansen, Donald I. Klippenstein, Frederick W. Hoppe, Ludson F. Worsham, Edwin Marjala and Warren Hall, Individually and on Behalf of All Members of the Sperry Class Previously Certified by the Court Whose Claims Have Not Been SettledCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Betts v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Dadisman v. MooreWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
- Opinion of the JusticesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Kanerva v. WeemsIllinois Supreme Court · 2014
- Smith v. StaffordAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Dannenberg v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 2016
- Lake v. State Health Plan For Teachers & State Emps.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
- Beggs v. City of PortalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.