Lillie v. Weyl-Zuckerman & Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County. Hugh H. Craig, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
In this case defendant appeals from a judgment rendered against it in the sum of $435.38 as damages for the breach of a contract.
The order of the court in overruling defendant’s general demurrer to the complaint is assigned as error. The complaint alleged the making of the contract, set out in haee verba, from which it appears that, on June 12, 1917, plaintiff agreed to sell and defendant agreed to buy the entire crop of potatoes grown by the former, the quality of which was specified as being first class, not less in weight than three ounces each, and to be delivered f. o. b. cars, Elsinore,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cuthill v. PeabodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Gay v. DareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by8 opinions
- Colvig v. RKO General, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- Sackett v. SpindlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- J. P. Armstrong v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- San Francisco Milling Co. v. Frye & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Madison v. Weyl-Zuckerman & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.