Madison v. Weyl-Zuckerman & Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This action, as shown by the complaint, was to recover damages for the defendant’s alleged breach of a contract.
In accordance with the verdict ■ of the jury which tried the case, judgment was entered for plaintiff:, from which defendant appeals.
[1] On June 19, 1917, at which time plaintiff had in the ground a crop of potatoes then ready for harvesting, he and defendant entered into a written contract as follows:
“Weyl-Zuckerman & Co., a corporation, purchases, and Chas. Madison sells the following product, to be sound, merchantable, of quality as follows on arrival at Porter-ville, to wit: 600…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cuthill v. PeabodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Remy v. OldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Gay v. DareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Lillie v. Weyl-Zuckerman & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
- Bennett v. PotterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
3Cited by2 opinions
- Turner, Kuhn & Fraser, Inc. v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Hamberger-Polhemus Co. v. LewinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929