Legal Opinion
San Francisco Milling Co. v. Frye & Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 4, 1934No. Civ. 9364PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMISON, J., pro tem.
This is an action upon a contract for the sale by plaintiff to defendant of one thousand tons of foul seed. Judgment was rendered for plaintiff. Thereupon defendant moved for a new trial and same being denied it prosecutes this appeal.
Two contracts for foul seed were produced at the trial of this action. One of them was dated April 5, 1930. This sale was confirmed by a man named King, of the firm of King Grain Co.,, brokers, acting on behalf of appellant. The confirmation in substance was that Frye and Company confirmed the sale of one thousand tons of foul seed (seeds…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Alameda County Title Insurance v. PanellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Gay v. DareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Lillie v. Weyl-Zuckerman & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
3Cited by4 opinions
- Leonard v. HustonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Paratore v. ScharetgCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Gold Mining & Water Co. v. SwinertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Gold Mining & Water Co. v. SwinertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943