Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Shelton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 10, 2004No. C932441DR; A119483PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEITS, J. pro tempore

Father appeals a modification of a dissolution judgment, primarily challenging a reduction in his parenting time. On de novo review, ORS 19.415(3) (2001),1 we modify the parenting schedule, remand the case for recalculation of child support, and otherwise affirm.

Mother and father have two children, L and A, who were 14 and 11 years old, respectively, at the time of the modification hearing in 2002. When the parties’ marriage was dissolved in 1993, they agreed to joint custody. The children’s primary residence was with mother, and father was given substantial parenting…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In Re Marriage of KunzeOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Oregon University System v. Oregon Public Employees UnionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. Matter of Marriage of MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of BergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. In re the Marriage of NimanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. In re the Marriage of SheltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. Dickson v. Abrams, Jr.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 2021
  5. T. H. v. M. P. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API