Legal Opinion

Matter of Marriage of Maddox

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 8, 1982No. 80-10-459, CA A20948PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Wife appeals the custody, visitation and property division provisions of a dissolution decree. We review de novo and affirm.

The parties have been married nine years. They have three children, Rille, age 8, Sarah, age 3, and Elisabeth, age 1. Before they separated, husband worked during the day and attended law school at night. Wife worked at home and was the children’s primary caretaker. In August, 1980, while husband was vacationing with the two older children, wife moved into the home of Wayne Carr, taking Elisabeth with her. Rille and Sarah continued living with husband under an informal…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of HaguewoodOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of NiedertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. Matter of Marriage of MeierOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. McFadden v. McFaddenOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Shrout v. ShroutOregon Supreme Court · 1960

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of BurnsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. In Matter of Marriage of BoldtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. In re the Marriage of SheltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. In re the Marriage of DotyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. In re the Marriage of MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API