Legal Opinion

T. H. v. M. P. B.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 23, 2008No. J040072, J040073, J040074; Petition Numbers 04028J, 04029J, 04030J; A135791Published

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.

In this guardianship proceeding, M. P. B., S. D. B., and S. J. B. (the children) appeal from a second supplemental judgment that modified their parenting time with their mother. They assign error to the requirement in that judgment that they have visits with mother that last longer than four hours at a time.1 On de novo review, ORS 419A.200(6)(b), we modify the second supplemental judgment to eliminate its provision for overnight visits but retain daytime visits at the level that the judgment requires.

We begin with the procedural history of the case and then turn to the evidence adduced at…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of OrtizOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In re the Marriage of SheltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. In re the Marriage of SheltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API