Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Shelton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 2, 2005No. C932441DR; A119483PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEITS, J. pro tempore

In our original opinion in this case, we modified the trial court’s parenting schedule. Mother now seeks reconsideration. We adhere to both our original opinion and disposition, allowing reconsideration only to clarify two issues.

Mother is primarily concerned that our original opinion leaves unresolved many issues that were resolved by the trial court’s parenting plan. Mother’s concern is misplaced and flows from her misunderstanding that we “reversed” the trial court’s parenting schedule. As stated consistently several times in our former opinion, we modified the trial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. CollinsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. In re the Marriage of SheltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of BergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. In re the Marriage of NimanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. Dickson v. Abrams, Jr.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 2021
  4. T. H. v. M. P. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API