Legal Opinion
United States v. Stull
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 14, 1952No. Civ. A. 3527PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HINCKS, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff in this action has moved for a preliminary injunction restraining the defendants from violation of the Housing and Rent Act of 1947, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1881 et seq. Its motion was brought under Sec. 206(b) of that Act; its complaint, in addition, requests further relief under Sec. 205 of the Act. 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, §§ 1895 and 1896(b). The defendants oppose this motion and have moved that the plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed, or, in the alternative, for summary judgment.
The defendants are the owners of a building at 230 Main Street in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Porter v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Porter v. DickenSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Brown v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
- National Lead Co. v. NulsenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bailey v. Safeway, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Associated Construction Co. v. Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1986
- Sawyer Nurseries v. GalardiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- United States v. StullCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- United States v. StullCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.