Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Safeway, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 15, 2011No. A131349PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUVOLO, P. J.

I

INTRODUCTION

After appellant Jerry Bailey (Bailey) suffered an eye injury when a bottle of Cook’s Champagne exploded as he was erecting a sales display in one of *209respondent Safeway, Inc.’s (Safeway), stores, Bailey sued the manufacturer of the champagne bottle, Saint-Gobain Containers, Inc. (Saint-Gobain), for strict liability design defect under the consumer expectation theory; Bailey also sued Safeway under that same theory and for negligence. Bailey settled with Saint-Gobain and others for $1 million plus an assignment of Saint-Gobain’s equitable indemnity rights…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Lucido v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kim v. Toyota Motor Corp., California Court of Appeal, 2nd District2016
  2. Andrew Leahy v. Nutribullet, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021
  3. C.W. Howe Partners Inc. v. MooradianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  4. Focus 15, LLC v. NICO CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
  5. In re: Reza Fateh ManeshUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API