Legal Opinion

Dunham and Ross Co. v. Stevens

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 3, 1976No. 5536PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JAMES, Justice.

This is an instructed verdict case. Dun-ham and Ross Co., Plaintiff-Appellant, filed this suit against Defendant-Appellee William O. Stevens, alleging a cause of action based upon a written contract of sale wherein Plaintiff was purchaser and Defendant was seller. Plaintiff sued for the return of $10,000 earnest money placed in escrow in connection with said contract. Defendant Stevens filed a cross-action for the $10,000 earnest money. Trial was had to a jury at the conclusion of which each side filed a motion for instructed verdict. The trial court overruled…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McKelvy v. BarberTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Pollack v. PollackTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  3. Pollack v. PollackTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  4. Universal Life & Accident Insurance v. SandersTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Constant v. HoweTexas Supreme Court · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Guynn v. Corpus Christi Bank & TrustCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. Monk v. Dallas Brake & Clutch Service Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
  3. Hensley v. WilliamsWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  4. McAx Sign Co., Inc. v. Royal Coach, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Mar-Len of Louisiana, Inc. v. Gorman-Rupp Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API