Legal Opinion
Doty v. Eastman Kodak Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 12, 1996PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted that part of defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action. Plaintiff’s slide down an embankment is not the type of hazard that Labor Law § 240 (1) was designed to protect against (see, Williams v White Haven Mem. Park, 227 AD2d 923; Radka v Miller Brewing, 182 AD2d 1111; Staples v Town of Amherst, 146 AD2d 292; Siragusa v State of *962New York, 117 AD2d 986, Iv denied 68 NY2d 602). We do not address…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Staples v. Town of AmherstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Siragusa v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Williams v. White Haven Memorial Park, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Radka v. Miller Brewing, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gielow v. Rosa Coplon HomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Waszak v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Erickson v. Cross Ready Mix, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Moore v. Elmwood-Franklin SchoolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Striegel v. Hillcrest Heights Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.