Legal Opinion

Waszak v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 29, 2000No. Claim No. 87776PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: In this action by claimant to recover for injuries sustained at a construction site, defendant appeals, contending that the Court of Claims erred in denying that part of its motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the cause of action under Labor Law § 241 (6) insofar as it is based on the alleged violation of 12 NYCRR 23-1.23 (a) and (b). Claimant cross-appeals, contending that the court erred in granting that part of defendant’s motion seeking summary judgment…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Rizzuto v. L.A. Wenger Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. People v. HolmesNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Reisch v. Amadori Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. Gielow v. Rosa Coplon HomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bax v. Allstate Health Care, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Hennard v. BoyceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Cowan v. ADF Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Erickson v. Cross Ready Mix, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API