Legal Opinion

Moore v. Elmwood-Franklin School

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 29, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order reversed on the law without costs, motion denied, summary judgment granted to defendant and third cause of action dismissed. Memorandum: Plaintiff was straddling the peak of a roof when his foot slipped and he slid several feet down the roof before his fall was stopped. Plaintiff sustained severe burns during the fall when hot tar that he had been pouring spilled on him. Supreme Court granted plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on liability under Labor Law § 240 (1). That was error.

Although plaintiff was working at an elevated worksite, plaintiff’s slide several feet down…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williams v. White Haven Memorial Park, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Doty v. Eastman Kodak Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Striegel v. Hillcrest Heights Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Striegel v. Hillcrest Heights Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API