Legal Opinion
Siragusa v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 21, 1986No. Claim No. 65053PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The court did not err in dismissing the claims under Labor Law §§ 200, 240 (1); § 241 (6). The claims pursuant to Labor Law §§ 200, 241 (6) are subject to the defense of comparative negligence and require *987inquiry into the correlation of negligence and comparative negligence in causing the injuries complained of (Long v Forest-Fehlhaber, 55 NY2d 154, 159-161; Allen v Cloutier Constr. Corp., 44 NY2d 290). The evidence supports the trial court’s conclusion that the accident did not result from any negligence on the part of the State, but…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Long v. Forest-FehlhaberNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- DaBolt v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Nagel v. MetzgerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Kahn v. Gates Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3Cited by27 opinions
- Staples v. Town of AmherstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Violette v. Armonk Associates, L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Yaeger v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Dilluvio v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Rocovich v. Consolidated Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.