Legal Opinion

Savannah Bank & Trust Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 31, 1932No. M-316PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

Plaintiffs sue to recover $3,637.80 paid April 21, 1925, as interest on a portion of an additional tax for the calendar year 1916, which additional tax was assessed by the commissioner July 28, 1919, and paid May 1, 1923, after consideration and rejection by the commissioner of the decedent’s claim for abatement filed October 13, 1919.

Plaintiffs claim that the interest sued for was collected after the period of limitation within which collection thereof could lawfully be made and constitutes an overpayment within the purview of section 607 of the Revenue Act of 1928, and that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Graham & Foster v. GoodcellSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Stange v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Aiken v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. W. P. Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Daily Pantagraph, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Holton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1946
  2. Leach Corp. v. BlacklidgeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1938
  3. First Nat. Bank of Chicago v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
  4. Hills v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934
  5. Connor v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API