Holton v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
LITTLETON, Judge.
Plaintiff brought this suit to recover job and office overhead expense for the periods from March 19 to November 15, 1935, and November 16, 1935, to January 28, 1936, (findings 26-30), for alleged unreasonable delay (findings 9, 22-24), for which he alleges the defendant was responsible and for which it should respond in damages for breach of the contract.
Prior to the making of the contract with plaintiff on November 22, 1934, defendant and the Largura Construction Company had entered into a contract for the construction by the Largura Company of a post office building at Oak…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- North Chicago Rolling Mill Co. v. St. Louis Ore & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Myerle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1897
- United States v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Crown Coat Front Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Nager Electric Company, Inc. And Keystone Engineering Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Dale Construction Co. v. United States, Seaboard Surety Co.United States Court of Claims · 1964
- Copco Steel & Engineering Co. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Pennsylvania Coal & Coke Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.