Legal Opinion
Daily Pantagraph, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided June 10, 1929No. F-88PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GREEN, Judge.
The defendant sets up objections to the jurisdiction of the court in this ease, both as to the whole thereof and especially to some specific portions. It will be necessary.to first consider these objections.
It is urged on behalf of the defendant that taxes paid for the years 1917 and 1918 may not be recovered because plaintiff was granted a special assessment for those years, and it is also asserted in argument that plaintiff was accorded and accepted the benefits of the application of the special assessment provisions of the Revenue Acts of 1917 and 1918. We do not think this…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Edwards v. SlocumSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Williamsport Wire Rope Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- United States v. WoodwardSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Concrete Engineering Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- BF Sturtevant Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1935
- Savannah Bank & Trust Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
- Lewis A. Crossett Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
- New England Mut. Life Ins. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.