Legal Opinion

Connor v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 3, 1936No. L-508PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

The Tillotson Manufacturing Company, herein referred to as the taxpayer, overpaid its income and profits ■ tax for .1917 in the amount of $17,964.53 in excess of the partial allowance of $8,900.41 made by the Bureau of Internal Revenue in April, 1926, which was scheduled in May, 1926, and credited in partial satisfaction of a jeopardy assessment theretofore made for 1918.

There is no question concerning the overpayment and the amount thereof is stipulated. The only question involved, which was raised by the defendant for the first time after this suit had been instituted, is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Memphis Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. United States v. MichelSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. United States v. Factors & Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Pratt & Whitney Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934
  5. Savannah Bank & Trust Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Foundation Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936
  2. Roe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
  3. Boyce v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API