Legal Opinion

Hills v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 5, 1934No. L-153PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

The questions involved in this case have been ably argued orally and in briefs on the three occasions that they have been presented to the court: First, upon the defendant’s demurrer to the petition; second, upon its motion to amend the findings and for a new trial on the demurrer; and, third, upon the merits. Little remains to be said that has not already been stated in the opinions previously rendered in the case, which we now reaffirm on the present hearing upon the merits.

The facts now before the court do not call for a different conclusion. On the contrary, they…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. Felt & Tarrant Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Cary v. CurtisSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  3. United States v. MichelSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  5. Collector v. HubbardSupreme Court of the United States · 1871

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Braun v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942
  2. Tait v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
  3. Haebler v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934
  4. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1935
  5. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API