Legal Opinion

Walker v. Adamson

California Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1937No. S. F. 15801PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment for the plaintiff in an action for damages arising out of an automobile accident. It is companion to the case of McCann v. Hoffman, S. F. No. 15802 (ante, p. 279 [70 Pac. (2d) 909]), this day decided. Both cases involve the question of what constitutes compensation within the meaning of the so-called “guest” law of this state. (See. 141%, Stats. 1931, p. 1693, now sec. 403, Vehicle Code.)

The plaintiff’s injuries were sustained when the automobile driven by the defendant skidded on wet pavement while the parties were on a trip to Lake, Tahoe.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McCann v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Bryant v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  3. O'Brien v. WoldsonWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Peccolo v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Bree v. LambSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. McCann v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Druzanich v. CrileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Huebotter v. FollettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Whitechat v. GuyetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Duncan v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1942

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API