Legal Opinion

Bree v. Lamb

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 7, 1935PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.

Plaintiff’s intestate received fatal injuries when an automobile in which he was riding and which was driven by the defendant skidded upon the wet surface of the road, left the highway and ran into a fence. It was the contention of the defendant that plaintiff’s intestate was his guest within the meaning of § 1628 of the General Statutes, which denies recovery for injuries sustained by a guest unless the accident was intentional or caused by heedless and reckless disregard of his rights. Defendant assigns as error the action of the trial court in submitting this issue to the jury, and its…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kruy v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  2. Chaplowe v. PowsnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  3. Russell v. ParleeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  4. Burke v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. McCann v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Duncan v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Albrecht v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Miller v. FairleyOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Smith v. CluteNew York Court of Appeals · 1938

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API