Chicago. R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Dizney
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Garvin County; 1<\ B. Swank, Judge. Action by George M. Dizney against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
HOOKER, O.
This is an action for personal injuries alleged to have been received by the defendant in error while a passenger upon one of the trains of the plaintiff in error operating between Shawnee, Okla;., and Oklahoma City, Okla., on the 14th day of March, 1913. In the petition it is alleged that the train upon which the plaintiff below was riding was a vestibule train, and consisted of an engine and three passenger coaches, and that the passageways between the three passenger coaches were wholly closed by vestibules; and that each of said vestibules had an outer opening upon the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Traver v. Spokane Street Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. PitchfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Enid City Ry. Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. MilamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cosden Pipe Line Co. v. BerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Shell Petroleum Corporation v. PerrinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. SheltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Dewitt v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. ForresterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.