Legal Opinion

Boldman v. Mt. Hood Chemical Corp.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1979No. 406-763, SC 25009PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, C. J.

This is an action for indemnity by Mt. Hood Chemical Corporation as third-party plaintiff against FMC Corporation, third-party defendant. The action arises out of the death of one of FMC’s employes. Worker’s compensation benefits were paid to the spouse of the deceased employe. The personal representative subsequently brought an action against Mt. Hood, the supplier of a chemical which caused the employe’s death. Mt. Hood filed a third-party complaint seeking indemnity from FMC. Mt. Hood subsequently settled the original claim. The indemnity claim was tried and submitted to a jury which…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dole v. Dow Chemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Baugh v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. McDonnell Aircraft Corp. v. Hartman-Hanks-Walsh Painting Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  5. Brown v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Decker v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Durniak v. August Winter & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. Henning v. General Motors Assembly DivisionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Young v. Mobil Oil Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  5. Roberts v. Gray's Crane & Rigging, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API