Legal Opinion

Bessire and Co. v. . Ward

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 11, 1934PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchencK, J.

“The plaintiff’s motion for judgment upon the answer is, in effect, a demurrer to the answer, and can only prevail when the matters pleaded constitute an admission of plaintiff’s cause of action or are insufficient as a defense or constitute new matter insufficient in law to defeat plaintiff’s claim.” Pridgen v. Pridgen, 190 N. C., 102.

The answer of the appealing defendant must be construed liberally, which means that every reasonable intendment must be taken in favor of her and if the answer contains facts sufficient to constitute a defense, it must be sustained. Pridgen v. Pridgen, supra,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pridgen v. . PridgenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Huss v. HussCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Sale v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Adams v. . CleveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Carroll v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API