Carroll v. . Brown
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeNNy, J.
The only question involved on this ‘appeal is: Was the plaintiff entitled to judgment on the pleadings ?
Tbe allegation of tbe plaintiff to tbe effect that tbe note upon which be bottoms bis action, draws interest from date until paid at the rate of six per cent per annum, is denied by tbe defendants in their answer. Tbe note is not set out in tbe complaint, hence we think the pleadings raise a question of fact for tbe jury. Bessire & Co. v. Ward, 206 N. C., 858, 175 S. E., 208; Wilson v. Allsbrook, 203 N. C., 498, 166 S. E., 313.
Moreover, the defendants allege it was understood at tbe time…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jones v. . CasstevensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Pugh v. . NewbernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Wilson v. AllsbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Bessire and Co. v. . WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Wilson v. . AllsbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- BORDEN, INCORPORATED v. BrowerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Diemar & Kirk Company v. Smart Styles, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Raleigh Federal Savings Bank v. GodwinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Langston v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.