Gregory v. Bush
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Barry. (Hooker, J.) Bill to enjoin overflow of complainant’s land, etc. Defendant appeals. The facts are stated in ■the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
The parties to this suit are farmers in the ■.township of Hastings, Barry county. Their farms are sep*38arated by a highway, running north and south, complainant’s premises being on the east side, and defendant’s land on the west side, thereof.
The complainant seeks to enjoin defendant from further digging and tiling any drains on his farm, by which the water being or falling on his land will be conveyed to and upon the premises of complainant.
His bill alleges in substance that the premises owned and occupied by him are of the value of $5,000; that the highway is his west boundary line; that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barkley v. . WilcoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Livingston v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
- Pettigrew v. Village of EvansvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
- Boyd v. ConklinMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Adams v. WalkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1867
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Wiggins v. City of BurtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Todd v. York CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
- Allen v. Morris Building Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Kernen v. Homestead Development Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1999
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.