Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Conklin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1884PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Error to Lenawee. (Howell, J.) Trespass. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Boyd sued defendants for removing part of a dam which he had built across the outlet which drained an adjoining highway and higher lands adjacent. Lorenzo D. Dewey owned a farm running north of the highway about half a mile, and a swale ran through this land from north to south which crossed the road through a culvert from which the water flowed across Boyd’s farm to a pond on his land which has no surface outlet. The swale is crossed by an old beaver dam near its north end, and a creek called Evans’ creek, a little to the north of it, sometimes overflows so that the water runs over this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Barkley v. . WilcoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Nevins v. City of PeoriaIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Livingston v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  4. Gillham v. Madison County RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Shane v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. GrovesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Wiggins v. City of BurtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Gregory v. BushMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. O'Connell v. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  5. Morrissey v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1893

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API