Legal Opinion

Manary v. Anderson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 2013No. 86776-3PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairhurst, J.

¶1 In this case, we are asked to decide whether Jeffrey Manary or Edwin A. Anderson is entitled to a decedent’s interest in real property that had been deeded to a trust. Manary claims the interest as a successor trustee; his claim is based on the trust. Anderson claims the interest as a testamentary beneficiary; his claim is based on chapter 11.11 RCW, the Testamentary Disposition of Nonprobate Assets Act (Act).1 The Act allows the “owner” of a “nonprobate asset” to dispose of the asset by will if the owner “specifically refer [s] to” the asset in his will. RCW 11.11.020(1). When an owner…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of BueckingWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center v. Gooding CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Eubanks v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Gragg v. Orange Cab Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2013
  5. In Re the Estate of LoweCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API