Legal Opinion

Folsom v. Burger King

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1998No. 64479-9PublishedCited by 347 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

958 P.2d 301 (1998)

135 Wash.2d 658

Thorabelle I. FOLSOM, the Personal Representative of the Estate of Robert T. Folsom, Petitioner,

v.

BURGER KING; Burger King of Spokane, Respondents,

Hatter Investments, Inc., Ed Hatter and Jane Doe Hatter, husband and wife, Respondents,

Spokane Security System, Inc., Respondent,

Robert W. Hanley and Jane Doe Hanley, husband and wife; and John Does I-V and Jane Does I-V, Defendants.

Dianna J. HARTVIGSEN, the Personal Representative of the Estate of Dawnya Michelle Calbreath, Petitioner,

v.

BURGER KING; Burger King Of Spokane, Respondents,

Hatter Investments, Inc., Ed…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Mt. Park Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. TydingsWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Hansen v. FriendWashington Supreme Court · 1992

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by347 opinions

  1. Vallandigham v. Clover Park School District No. 400Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Vallandigham v. CLOVER PARK SCHOOL DIST.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Keck v. CollinsWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Berger v. SonnelandWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Berger v. SonnelandWashington Supreme Court · 2001

342 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API