In re the Marriage of Buecking
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, C.J.
¶1 Amy Westman1 filed for legal separation from Tim Buecking. Over a year later, she filed an amended petition for dissolution of marriage. By statute, a court cannot enter a decree of dissolution of marriage until 90 days after the petition is filed. Here, the decree was entered 8 days too soon. Mr. Buecking appealed, raising for the first time on appeal his claim that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because it entered the decree before the 90-day period had elapsed.
¶2 We hold that the 90-day period commences when the petition for dissolution is filed and not when a…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Smith v. Stillwell-SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Marley v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. MoenWashington Supreme Court · 1996
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Maytown Sand & Gravel, LLC v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- Banowsky v. BackstromWashington Supreme Court · 2019
- Estate of Jepsen v. MilesWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- State Of Washington, App. v. Darla Kidder, Resp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Viewcrest Condominium Association, Res. v. Brenda L. Robertson, App.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2016
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.